Lab 6
Part 1
Significance Map
Cluster Map
Natural Breaks Map
Significance Map with 999 Randomizations
Significance Map with 99999 Randomizations
Cluster Map with 999 Randomizations
Cluster Map with 99999 Randomizations
Selecting High-High Regions by Scatterplot Quadrant
Selecting High-High Regions Manually
Selecting Low-High Regions from the Menu
Adding LISA Stats to Table
Selection Using Significance Filter
Highlighting Multiple Significance Factors
Selection Using Custom FDR Significance Filter
Selection Using Custom FDR Significance Filter
Displaying Cores and Neighbors
Overlaying Cores and Neighbors
Selecting Significance from Cores and Neighbors
Conditional Cluster Map
Greary Significance Map
Greary Cluster Map
Selecting High-High Regions in Greary Scatterplot by Quadrant
Selecting Low-Low Regions from Menu
Selecting Negative Correlation Regions from Menu
Greary Significance Map (varies from Moran I)
Greary Cluster Map with Significance of p = 0.1
Greary Cluster Map with Custom Significance of p = 0.00012
Gi Significance Map
Gi Cluster Map
Gi Cluster Map with Significance of p = 0.1
Greary Significance Map (varies from Moran I and Greary)
Gi Cluster Map with Custom FDR Significance
Part 2
For my part 2 analysis I ran a regression on the Baltimore City dataset to see if family size was correlated with poverty level.
The regression report calculated a Moran’s I value of 0.00016, suggesting that the two were strongly correlated. I then examined the values for Lagrange Lag and error, which were as follows:
Lag = 0.42748
Error = 0.00086
These results would indicate that the error model results are extremely significant, thus it is a better fit.
I then ran the error model, which yielded a probability of 0.00252, confirming my hypothesis of correlation.
The resulting Bivariate Moran’s I Maps are displayed below.
Cluster Map
Significance Map
Scatterplot
Conditional Significance Map
Part 3